In response to this line in a NYtimes article:
“Mr. Abssi said he derived much of his spiritual guidance from Abu Abdullah Muhammad al-Bukhari, a ninth-century Islamic scholar. A recent study by the Defense Department’s Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, N.Y., listed Mr. Bukhari among the 20 Islamic scholars who had greater influence today among militant Arabs than Mr. bin Laden…”
AmalA is justfiably incensed:
Mr. Bukhari??????
It’s like calling Thomas Aquinas Mr. Aquinas!
It’s an interesting slip: comes out of lumping people together and collapsing past and present so history itself is erased: so now we have Mr. Abssi, Mr. Bin Laden, and Mr. Bukhari!
Makes perfect orientalist sense!
She could not have put it better. ”Mr. Bukhari” is like calling Thomas Aquinas Mr. Aquinas!

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 26, 2007 at 11:20 am
Fugstar
Not aquinus dude. Maybe Mr Hansard (folks who transribe and publish British parliamentary utterances).
April 27, 2007 at 7:11 pm
shamshir
You would be right, Fugstar, if the comparison was about functions. Then Mr. Bukhari - the collector of ahadith - would not be like Mr. Aquinas. But the comparison was really more about their prominent positions in their respective canons. AmalA might be comparing apples to bananas - but at least she’s comparing fruits instead of comparing bananas to creepy crawly critters the way the NYTimes article was…
April 27, 2007 at 7:25 pm
Best quote I read all week: Land of the Free edition « Addafication
[...] Top Posts Abbas Kiarostami UnpluggedDying to KillDivide & RuleExile IIIExiled IIBrac University Leading the WayBest line I read all week… [...]