Let’s lay aside the question of whether it makes sense to have a law that makes it punishable to offend the vaguely defined sensitivities of a particular religious group. The justifiability of such a law is irrelevant when we debate Arifur Rahman’s fate. For anyone who has seen Arif’s Prothom Alo cartoon (see it on shadakalo; read the translation at 3rd World View, along with reactions and updates from the Bangladeshi blogosphere), it is clear that the cartoon is not at all about the Prophet (S) or about the beliefs and practices of Islam and Muslims. Rather it is about the ignorance of those who think that there is some kind of religious requirement to have the name of the blessed Prophet (S) somewhere in one’s name. Of course, there is no such requirement - in anything that the Prophet (S) said or did, or in the Book. Pointing out the folly of believing that it is some kind of religious requirement cannot, in any stretch of the imagination, be viewed as abuse of the name of the Prophet (S) or of his religion.
And yet, Arifur Rahman is headed to a month of detention, for something he manifestly did not do. We are told he insulted the Prophet. When? We are told he hurt the sensibilities of Muslims. How? Arif is being thrown into prison on what is clearly a lie.
I am reminded as I sit up this night shivering as I contemplate Arif’s fate - and ours - of the story of Yusuf and Zulaykha, of the shirt rent in the back, of the snares of the wicked and the unjust. Today Arif is our Yusuf - he who was thrown into the dungeons because of passionate, unreasoning, unreasonable lies and the cold, unprincipled calculations of cynical men. I can only pray that Arif is granted some of the perseverence and protection, and ultimately, blessings showered on Yusuf.
Justice in our Land of Gold is in hiding. Reason has escaped us. Truth has fled. The City of Mosques lies in the Republic of Fear. None of us is safe here when things we say can mean what they manifestly are not, and where the compass points the qibla at the direction and discretion of the angriest, ugliest shouts. Let us bear witness.

12 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 20, 2007 at 5:45 pm
Asif S
Saif,
Very sad day for us and i couldn’t have put it any better than this. What is even depressing is the nature of debate. His “guilt” is being admitted by all in the print media. Even New Age, which claims the moral authority on issues these days, did not have a word to say on it. Very sad. I heard just now Weekly 2000 Eid Shonkha got banned because of carrying an article by exiled writer Daud Haider.
An illegimitate government typically look for legitimacy in cheap popularity stunts like these. Very depressing times. Can we love our country and love justice at the same time? Not these days.
September 20, 2007 at 6:05 pm
Global Voices Online » Bangladesh: Cartoons and Religion
[...] Adda on the detention of Arifur Rahman because of a cartoon, laws and sensitivity of religious groups. Share This [...]
September 20, 2007 at 6:52 pm
AsifY
“The City of Mosques lies in the Republic of Fear” …. yes, but what are the Mosques doing right now to ensure that people are not afraid of the Republic? Nothing. To quote a good friend of mine, silence is complicity at this point.
Thank you Saif for a very restrained piece on matters.
September 20, 2007 at 11:17 pm
Fuzzy
Did not a SINGLE media (newspaper, tv, radio) highlight the ludicrousness of this whole issue? Did no one in the public arena explain how this has nothing to do with religion and offending the Prophet?? Where are our outspoken liberals and passionate intellectuals?? Hiding inside the web world I guess, like Saif and the rest of us!
September 21, 2007 at 2:40 am
Saif
I agree AsifY bhai - silence is complicity. Our religious elite continue to fail us.
Fuzzy - there’s no defense to your charge that all we are doing, all we can do, is hiding inside the web world. Bearing witness may be more than what has been done so far. But it is not enough. No, it is not enough.
September 21, 2007 at 3:41 am
AsifY
*sigh* What would you have us do fuzzy?
March down the streets singing “Amra chaatro, Amra bol, Amra Chatro Dol”? Follow it up with some bhaangchur?
Get jailed and sing “Karar oi louho kopat”? Ki kortey boltesen?
A lot of us are doing the best we can. We’re speaking out against it. Passionate intellectuals are the reason we are here. Everyone in Bangladesh is passionate about something or the other. No one in Bangladesh is passionate for democracy and letting someone express contradictory opinions. Not even our so-called liberal intellectuals, who will choose anti-democratic means to ensure their ideological ends: case in point, Mr. Motiur Rahman.
The poor cartoonist is simply caught in the crossfire between two ideologues. How many this will turn off from working for newspapers we’ll just have to wait and see. Needless to say, if you’re an aspiring cartoonist with provocative work in Bangladesh, do NOT work for Prothom Alo.
September 21, 2007 at 3:46 am
AsifY
I forgot to add: if you’re an aspiring cartoonist with provocative work and social commentary, you might want to work for papers with Shibir/Jamaat backing. It seems that jokes about the misuse of the Prophet’s name are acceptable when it is printed there.
If such is the will of God as interpreted by the khatib, then so be it. He certainly knows better than an ordinary believer like me, right?
September 21, 2007 at 1:09 pm
Unheard Voices » Bangladesh today
[...] spare a thought for Arifur [...]
September 21, 2007 at 9:03 pm
Fuzzy
FYI, I’m not blaming anyone for hiding in the web, there’s not much else we bloggers can do. But I’m just shocked and stunned that no one in Dhaka, in media, public discussions, etc. brought up the ridiculousness of this whole deal. Its been a complete black-and-white issue with EVEYONE apologzing and no one even hinting that this was not wrong. But then, fear does rule our lives. Anyone that does not apologize and beg forgiveness immediately is an automatic target for jamaat gundas.
September 22, 2007 at 4:06 pm
Command-and-control « Addafication
[...] seem to be learning from our successes. In a week where violence has broken out over the cartoon non-issue, there are ominous signs of what may be the beginnings of yet another period of rioting and street [...]
September 25, 2007 at 6:34 am
Natasha Ahmad
I really do not see why each and every big time newspapers had to say SORRY….. where are we going? When Sibir uses the same cartoon then it is ok, when they issue a fatwa then it is fine….and when we ( I am sorry to make this division but I do not have any choice…….) use the same thing it is a “crime”, the mullahs have all the say, they decide who can stay and who should be stopped….why?? why we are always hurting the mullahs and what every they do we all have to follow that???…why don’t we have the administration, authorities, government in our side? It seems we are going TOWARDS AN ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH…….did we fight for this BANGLADESH? Why are we promoting the Jamat and the law of ISLAM….who are we actually helping?
October 3, 2007 at 3:37 pm
Global Voices Online » Bangladesh: Bloggers demand release of detained cartoonist
[...] * Addafication [...]