New Age “Extra” has a thoughtful article this week on the food crisis. This article actually quotes prominent economists who cast blame on the government in addition to the natural disasters and international factors. In case you have been wondering about recent food riots elsewhere in the world, BBC reports on Haiti (where cost of food rose 50%, the costs have risen 40% in Bangladesh) and unfolding crises in Asia, Africa, and Australia (you can access those pages through the Haiti link). This technocrat studded government’s inability to avert/minimize the food crisis in an efficient way may well go down as its greatest failure.
From the beginning many Bangladeshis were skeptical of the CTG’s hubris and overreach. A defensible argument can be made that this government’s political moves have crippled the economy over the last year and half. The frightening part is we have not yet hit bottom, it is still unclear if/when elections will be held, the big questions about Khaleda/Hasina remain unanswered, and general Moeen U Ahmed has generously given himself another year’s tenure in the “national interest.”
If the political parties can focus on reinstating democracy, this government will soon face a powerful coalition of political parties and frustrated masses. In the meantime, CTG has been taking numerous steps to seed dissension both within and among political parties. I think the whole move for war crimes trials, truth commission, in addition to the BNP rift, are parts of this strategy. I am all for war crimes trials, but under a democratic government, simply for legitimacy’s sake, same goes with truth commissions. Frankly, I have had it with this government, the poorest of the poor are starving (see below, people are forgetting what daal tastes like), that means crores of Bangladeshis are going hungry. Most importantly, I do not think the average Bangladeshi trusts this government’s good intentions, let alone ability to implement policies based on those intentions. It is time for elections, and time to wave a sorry goodbye to the CTG. Yes, I know this is easier said than done. Certain steps still need to be taken before we can have fair elections, but I think it is time we gave the CTG a few months to do what it can, and then hold elections. All of this is assuming that the political parties will behave themselves.
The CTG has abused the faith and trust of the people of Bangladesh and is pushing us towards a dangerous and uncertain future with its foot dragging disguised in lofty rhetoric. It is taking gleeful advantage of political parties that simply cannot seem to place the national interest above party/factional/personal interest. I can only hope that our politicians can heed their better angels and unite for democracy above all. Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen famously argued that democracies are better at famine prevention than dictatorships. I can only hope that Bangladesh 2008/2009 will not become yet another case that proves Amartya Sen right.
Excerpts from “Extra” below:
Undoubtedly, the worst conditions are with the poorest of the poor, particularly labourers and rickshaw-pullers who are unable to work unless they have their three meals a day.
While their families go without meals for two or three days at a stretch, they must share the largest chunk of their daily earnings on their own food. Economist Abul Barakat estimates that round half of the population are going half-fed or without food.
Nurul Islam, a 38-year-old rickshaw-puller, moved to Dhaka seven or eight months ago. He spends Tk 60 to Tk 80 a day on food, mostly in the mess halls. ‘I start work at 11am and work till late in the evening. It is difficult to make enough money.’
It is the same for Abu Bakr, a 56-year-old who has been pulling rickshaws for nearly twenty-six years. ‘Ten years ago I used to pay Tk 30 for the rickshaw; nowadays they ask for Tk 90 or Tk 100. Then you need at least Tk 60 for food.’
‘For a while, I forgot how dal [lentils] tastes as I could only afford to buy rice and even the price of wheat had gone up from Tk 15 to Tk 45,’ says Fazlu, a rickshaw-puller aged 35.
‘Dal now costs Tk 90 per kilo,’ says Abdus Selim, the owner of a small stall in Moghbazar that sells rice, eggs, oil and other essentials. ‘Hardly anyone buys dal now; it’s too expensive and beyond their means.’
He reports that people have been buying more or less the same amount of rice over the past year, since they cannot choose to buy any less, but instead are cutting down on other costs such as meat and vegetables.…
The World Food Program predicted that the rising prices of food items (see UN warning from Dec 2007), especially rice, could cause political instability as poorer households spend most or all their income on food. The UN agency said that the possibility of political, economic and social unrest is growing as the price of food is rising much faster than people’s wages in Bangladesh.
Politicians and economists observed that the hard-pressed people would have taken to the streets had the state of emergency not been in force.
‘What has till now prevented a rise in crime is the largely visible security forces and policemen everywhere. But sooner or less, I think it will become inevitable as more and more people reach a point where they have absolutely nothing to lose,’ says N Ahad, a private service holder, also a victim of food shortage.
…
Protests have already begun.
On March 25, several hundreds formed a human chain before the Chittagong Press Club on Saturday, protesting against unusual price hike of essential commodities and sale of unpacked and unhygienic baby food.
In Sylhet, Rajshahi, Bogra, Barisal, Khulna and Jamalpur, according to New Age reports, people have become frustrated with the high prices and only find a small measure of respite from the OMS centres.
Poor response
The continuing crisis of rice is a result of the government’s failure to ensure timely import, point out economists. Although, the twin floods and cyclone Sidr hampered rice production, experts feel, the market could be stabilised had concrete and faster steps been taken.
The government has been slow to tackle the problem and has only recently set up open market sales (OMS) around the country, and that too in small numbers.
….
Economist professor Abul Barakat puts the blame for the current price spiral on the free market economy and specifically ties the rice price rise to market speculation, import problems, high production cost and a lack of coordination among the ministries.
Zaid Bakht, research director of the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, says the government was late in making pragmatic decisions keeping the global food production and supply situations in mind. He believes that programmes such as open market sale and vulnerable group feeding should have been launched earlier to keep people’s sufferings at minimum levels.

16 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 8, 2008 at 12:12 am
fug
That a chap like abul barakat can make such statements in the media and go unchallenged. It is hard to take anything he says on anything seriously because he is so extreme and ahistorical. a true craponomist of budhijibist proportions whos estimation means little as it is so unsubstantiated. cute though.
The BIDS fella puts it more soberly, that action was delayed. most strange in the article was this,
“On March 25, several hundreds formed a human chain before the Chittagong Press Club on Saturday, protesting against unusual price hike of essential commodities and sale of unpacked and unhygienic baby food.”
2 points of annoyance one for the less well off and one for the baby food eating class. very confused. On Amartya Sen, i realise its a convincing piece of common sense to blame all famine on nondemocracy, but there are so many other variables and parts of human history that arent touched in poverty and famines, that the dramatisation isnt really worth it. i hope that makes sense.
duas for agricultural discovery, ganj khedmot, the ease of the people and a positive way out of this fix, whatever its true extent. the mobocratics wouldnt have fared any better.
April 8, 2008 at 1:20 am
walaya
Good post! But here is what I am thinking: what happens after the care taker government holds the election? It’s either going to be BNP or AL. Unless there is a slightly better alternative, I am not sure if things are going to get dramatically better after the election, Allahu 3alem, who knows WHEN that will happen. So just holding the election is probably not the best recommendation. But then again, I certainly do NOT know enough to talk about it. I am a bit sick and tired of seeing AL and BNP ruining our country.
April 8, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Leela
Thank you for those great comments. Fugstar, I have read a number of Prof. Barakat’s papers on the partisan abuse of the vested property act and found them fascinating and well done. Unlike many academics in Bangladesh, he has a real drive to do actual research backed by fieldwork and I applaud him for that. So I would avoid a blanket statement. You’re right though, his comments in this context seemed lackluster. The Sen point is not the main point of course. The main point of this post is the restoration of democracy and that brings me to walaya’s comment. Yes, we do have to consider the alternative to CTG in calling for its removal. There is no question of pining away for old-style BNP AL fighting. The current situation in Kenya, where the peace deal between the warring political parties just fell apart is a testament how difficult and short lived reconciliation can be. I too share the fear that post CTG we will return to politics as usual. However, I hope that we won’t, not all the way. It is unrealistic to expect our democracy will suddenly function smoothly. It will take decades, perhaps even longer to get anywhere near that point. However, it is very important that we get back on that track. Right now it should be clear to everyone (despite the belated steps the CTG now seems to be taking) that the CTG was basically, a failure, and our only defensible, if imperfect, alternative is the democratic one.
April 9, 2008 at 9:27 am
fug
let us agree to differ on the extent of the dudes empirical dataset and sensitivity for phenomena that don’t match his internal theoretical clockwork. call it ikhtilaugh.
Peace deals sometimes work sometimes they don’t, but they are worth the experimental risk right? My honest opinion is ‘a plague on both your houses’, and by plague i mean some affliction that requires several centuries of convalescence. Neither of the parties have the chops to lead and guide the country, there is nothing in the budget, its about social mobility, self protection and state power.
Following the tsunami the tamil tiger conflict started again, but in Aceh things settled down. some people say that the difference has to do with immediate pre-disaster political postures and the extent of losses incurred. Immediately predisaster, the awami league were behaving like a bunch of baboons, and to be honest the parties have been slightly neutered, but not hamstrung as of yet. I think this period of democratic punctuation needs some inspiration and collective support from the whole of society. We don’t *really* want it to fail do we? just to prove that democracy is the new revelation.
I feel the sen argument is a democratic blackmail. a tad harsh, but fair. The big white powers drown and starve you if you don’t submit to miming their ideology and interests. They’ll call you autocratic and curse your human rights record, but thats hardly their concern.
April 9, 2008 at 1:30 pm
walaya
Leela, I totally agree that “our only defensible alternative is democracy”. But I would like to condition that statement by saying that “our only defensible alternative is democracy GIVEN that the democracy we are talking about is achievable.”
Now, let me elaborate a little on that. Let’s look at what has happened so far in Bangladesh’s 37 years of history. I was born in the 80’s, and I can only remember thing starting at fall of Ershad. Every single time during the election, we would have our candidates (namely, Hasina and Khaleda) debate about various things. They never talk about issues or give us a game plan about how they will handle any situation. Rather their sentence contains things like, “jatir jonok bongobondhu blah blah blah” Hasina acts like she owns the country because her father is supposedly the “Jatir jonok”. Khaleda, on the other hand acts like without Major Zia’s radio announcement, we wouldn’t have been liberated. Both of them keep on talking about the past without talking about the future or the present. Truth be told, when the country doesn’t have job security, we don’t really care about who liberated our country; sometimes I even wonder if we were READY to be independent, but that is for another day. Given that the politicians don’t give us transparent information, people of the country cannot make an informed decision to vote for any candidate and hence democracy doesn’t really hold all so much in Bangladesh.
And then you have the people belonging to the lower socio-economic class. These voters are easily bought by any given party. Some of the activists will go vote hundreds of time for one candidate, given that they are compensated well. No matter how hard you try, you cannot stop that, without developing a system to make sure the voters are tracked. Maybe that is why the care taker government is all gung-ho about creating a voter ID list or whatever junk.
And then think about the literacy rate of Bangladesh and the definition of “literacy”. I am not sure about the exact statistic about literacy rate, but it is hovering around 40% (and women have a much lower literacy rate). The definition of literacy is that as long as one can write his/her name, that person in considered “literate”. Given such low “literacy” rate, how many of our people can really make a sound decision about a candidate anyway? The “informed” voters are a minority in the country and hence their votes don’t count. Also in most villages women vote (if at all) whomever their husbands tell them to vote.
Given all these, the first question is Bangladesh ready for democracy?
First off we don’t have enough choices to begin with. Given the high illiteracy rate, can people really make a good judgment for themselves? Is democracy really the BEST answer? Even though being an American, I am not really allowed to speak against democracy, but I am convinced that democracy is NOT a universal solution. It may work in the West. But in other places, democracy is not necessarily the best answer.
I know I am not proposing any solution here. But I am just trying to think if we could think beyond so-called “democracy” which may often not be achievable in many places!
Sorry about such a long comment.
April 10, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Sajia Kabir
Maybe instead of renouncing democracy because of our illiteracy problems, we need to find a way of integrating the illiterate into a democratic system. How can we teach democratic values to the illiterate?
Renouncing democracy because of illiteracy sets a dangerous precedent because it gives the literate an incentive to limit education to the well-off in order to maintain the existing undemocratic institutions. They get an iron-clad excuse to say, “We’re not democratic because we’re not literate enough”, and then prevent literacy from developing so that there’s no basis for a democracy.
I don’t have any ready-made solutions. But remember, even dictatorships with strong economies like Chile under Pinochet had a substantially greater literacy rate than Bangladesh, so even if we had a dictatorship our economy and infrastructure would still be in a bad shape because of our lack of education.
April 10, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Sajia Kabir
I’ve been thinking that we need to take a look at the history of Western democracies and see what we can learn from them about integrating the illiterate into democratic institutions. (The fact we can even think of renouncing democracy because of illiteracy does not bode well)
I think we should look more closely at Revolutionary-era France rather than Britain, both because it has a greater history of violence and also because it went into universal male suffrage straight away from monarchy, unlike the UK’s property requirement.
April 10, 2008 at 10:41 pm
fug
I’m not too bothered with ‘illiteracy’ how it is defined in development speak, other than its relation to discernment. Thats why i think it starts with iqra bismirabbika. I fear what damage and sidetracking curriculum engineering democracy will cause if its done. We’ll just end up with more text book rubbish and children who take the mickey out of them.
I think we have beautiful values, which we should learn, honour, translate and finnesse. I’m not sure what democratic values are, i thought it was just a neat technique for temporary leadership change and sharing the spoils of government?
April 12, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Leela
“taking the mickey out,” whatever that means, it sounds cool (watch me regret this comment).
April 14, 2008 at 10:57 am
fug
‘tacking the mickey’ means mocking, taking the p!ss. you amreekans…
April 14, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Leela
love it.
April 15, 2008 at 3:46 am
walaya
Sajia, I was not really renouncing democracy. I was just thinking whether or not we even have the ingredients for democracy. Illiteracy is just ONE problem. Like fug, I am not sure what the democratic values in the context of Bangladesh.
For this particular problem, I just fail to see how having to pick between AL and BNP could be our solution to CTG problem. I hope and pray it gets better, but for now I don’t see any promise.
April 15, 2008 at 10:49 am
fug
ingredients, we have a lot of great ingredients, but no cook to make the biryani.
‘democracy’ might qualify as a cooking utensil.
Democratic values mean divided/flacid national politics, open access to your markets and submission to western foreign policy interests. didnt you get the memo?
taking the mickey, i’m talking about students taking the mickey out of the half truths spun around national creation mythology. nirmuls would not be amused!
April 15, 2008 at 12:19 pm
walaya
“Democratic values mean divided/flacid national politics, open access to your markets and submission to western foreign policy interests. didnt you get the memo?”
Ohhhh that is RIGHT! I can’t believe I forgot. Yes, I got the memo, indeed, if not before, at least right around the time when Afghanistan was invaded and later again with Iraq invasion and later again with Iran being the biggest threat to democracy.
April 15, 2008 at 1:24 pm
fug
Im glad you received that memo. I was worried that the decoders werent working.
Whenever elections are held, it will be the awami league that get power. or that coalition politics succeeds again. but what will they have learnt? probably nothing, but it will be important to observe what they do and for the rest of the political community to bring the best out of them.
That will then be an opportunity for people to organise around a better vision, not set up an NGO and think a bit. Existing parties might want to change too, I realise that its hard when the state may be beating you black and blue. Jamat can do an AKP party, while the BNP can go UMNO in the mean time.
Meanwhile only 65 indians came on the Kolkatta to Dhaka train. I think ‘that one’ is just about past it.
April 21, 2008 at 8:06 pm
Nizam M. Selim
Walya and fug have a case in point, indeed! And, a poignant point at that. The Abul Barakats of the world rule the roost in Bangladesh, and we the myopic-idiots-of-a-populace gp ga-ga over the ratzmatazz of gibberish and jargons churned out from the pulpits by the do-gooders of Bangladesh and its dismal “Democracy”: Dr. Kamal Hossain, BCL, DCL, and name what not, currently adorned with the appellation (or, one might prefer to term it a suffix/prefix?) “DALAL HOSSAIN” by the Dhakaites. Hear, hear!
Abul Barajat, Dr. Kamal Hossain and their likes have after all the political Party of the “Father of the Nation” in tow. And, the Awami League is not shrinking one bit from kow-toeing the powers that be, even if such a power may be putting the dampers on Bangladesh to the extent that Doomsday appears to be on the loom! Three Cheers for AL-style Democracy, a-la BAKSAL of old: ONLY AWAMI LEAGUE AND GENERAL MOEEN/ARMY STRUTTING ON THE POLITICAL STAGE. “Public be damned”.
Walaya’s “Illiteracy” is the worst begotten problem of Democracy in Bangladesh. At the risk of appearing to be either pretentious or arrogant (which I am neither, I hope), the captive votes of “kajer bu’as” and Rickshaw wallahs have, I am afraid, have thrown up the convoluted configuration of what I am tempted to term RICKSHAW WALLAH DEMOCRACY in Bangladesh: disrespecter of all rules of law, a gander in the goose.
Thank God, I don;t vote, and haven’t ever considered getting registered for voting either. Votes and “Elections” alone don’t after all make Democracy singularly. If they do, as a matter of debate, then one has to thank the kajer bu’as and Rickshaw wallahs for having shaped and defined Bangladesh’s Democracy as the largest chunk of the “Electorate” for the last 36 years. In the same breath, one has to thank the likes of Hanif, Maya, Paltu, Khoka, Mirza Abbas, et al, for having populated the urban centres with ghettos for their “Vote Banks” among such kajer bu’as and Rickshaw wallahs. Knowledge Capital has never ever been the source and origin of Democracy in Bangladesh. Goons and “Gaddars” have arguably been the architects of Bangladesh’s “Democracy”.
Add to the goons and gaddars the DALAL HOSSAINS, and you may likely have a recipe for Iraq and Afghanistan revisited in Bangladesh in the not-too-distant future. Weird thought? Don’t discount it; not by a long shot.